Message-ID: <10197628.1075853205887.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 02:10:00 -0800 (PST)
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Richard B Sanders
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: rsanders.nsf

Do I need to get involved?



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/22/2001 04:50 PM
		
		 To: "Thomas Hetherington" <thetherington@bracepatt.com>
		 cc: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo

Yes, this is issue is still around.

Thomas, I had some correspondence faxed to you today.  In it SW is clearly 
taking the position that the damage to the generator occured after delivery 
under the contract.  I thought you addressed that well in your memo, however, 
I have another question.  What impact does the use of DDP (Incoterms) have?  
Is it just one more part of the contract to be taken as a whole, or might it 
have some greater significance?  

Will the passage of ROL impact the LD claim?  I assume not, but I want a 
sanity check.

Thanks,

Kay



"Thomas Hetherington" <thetherington@bracepatt.com> on 12/19/2000 09:47:11 AM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com> 

Subject: Westinghouse 501d memo

Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with 
respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package.  I will forward you an 
additional copy by fax.

TFAH  





